In this culture, and this time, it is the P. R. side first

I am not saying it makes sense but in the rational, or “rationalized” version of reality I am apparently supposed to believe that the way I can communicate with the president basically is the internet.

I do not have any particular comment about this. Maybe I am just too old or I do not "get it." What I would like to do is add my own internet experience into the collective data bank of our cultural knowledge.

Step one: I open an email from Barack Obama. This is because president Barack Obama in some sense supposedly sends me emails. That was proactive of him, wasn't it? Yeah and this is how you get elected president. But then I was proactive too, I guess, because I linked from there to the DNC (Democratic National Committee) This was proactive by me. For sure: I just searched “dnc” and immediately found myself on the Democr. Nat’l Comm. website.
What I learned is as follows.

I learned that the first thing you get is the “face” or external part or public relations part. That part of the experience is what comes first. This is considered the valid, respectable. This is the valid way to do it. The pattern, in a little more detail: first, you go into some web experience. This was because of the email from my good buddy Obama, of the U. S.?, and then it was, more pro-actively, from my side, from some another (DNC) website. But each time, what you get is not information per se: first it has to be sorted, into the outide or the wrapper ---- this is the “p. r.” side. That is the opening gambit on each web destination. It is the publicity or p. r. side first.

Of course this is not how a person communicates to a friend or someone that the persons normally works with. That's all I have to say for now.

Review

Book Review ; author: Ifill (Doubleday)



When stuff gets too static, something gives, and whites elect freaks

-with black skin-